Croatia vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Croatia
865.87 current US$
in 2020
Namibia
871.14 current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
39th
Namibia rank
38th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Croatia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 871.14 current US$ against 865.87 current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 5.27 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.
Croatia ranks 39th and Namibia ranks 38th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 296.2 current US$ | 270.29 current US$ | 25.91 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 487.39 current US$ | 421.17 current US$ | 66.23 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 872.88 current US$ | 852.27 current US$ | 20.61 current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 865.87 current US$ | 871.14 current US$ | 5.27 current US$ | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Croatia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 871.14 current US$ against 865.87 current US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Croatia and Namibia?
- 5.27 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Namibia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Croatia ranks 39th and Namibia ranks 38th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.