Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Congo
1,913 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,761 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
17th
Zambia rank
20th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Congo
- Zambia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,913 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 152 current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,161 current US$ | 654.72 current US$ | 506.6 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,487 current US$ | 1,378 current US$ | 108.49 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 2,056 current US$ | 2,308 current US$ | 252.81 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,913 current US$ | 1,761 current US$ | 152.41 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Congo or Zambia?
- Congo, at 1,913 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Congo and Zambia?
- 152 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Congo ranks 17th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.