Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Congo
1,913 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
1,832 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
17th
Guinea-Bissau rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Congo
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,913 current US$ against 1,832 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 81 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 17th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Guinea-Bissau in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,161 current US$ | 1,274 current US$ | 112.73 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 1,487 current US$ | 1,493 current US$ | 6.57 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 2,056 current US$ | 2,414 current US$ | 358.8 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1,913 current US$ | 1,832 current US$ | 81.19 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
- Congo, at 1,913 current US$ against 1,832 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 81 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Congo ranks 17th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.