Comoros vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Comoros
162.02 current US$
in 2020
Spain
175.55 current US$
in 2020
Comoros rank
106th
Spain rank
104th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Comoros
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 175.55 current US$ against 162.02 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 13.53 current US$.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 106th and Spain ranks 104th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Spain in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 173.67 current US$ | 145.45 current US$ | 28.23 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2000s | 208.92 current US$ | 147.77 current US$ | 61.16 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2010s | 231.88 current US$ | 185.48 current US$ | 46.41 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2020s | 162.02 current US$ | 175.55 current US$ | 13.53 current US$ | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Comoros or Spain?
- Spain, at 175.55 current US$ against 162.02 current US$ in Comoros as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Comoros and Spain?
- 13.53 current US$, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Spain?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Comoros and Spain rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Comoros ranks 106th and Spain ranks 104th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.