China vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
China
207.96 current US$
in 2020
Uganda
206.72 current US$
in 2020
China rank
97th
Uganda rank
98th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- China
- Uganda
How they compare
China currently reports 207.96 current US$ against 206.72 current US$ in Uganda, a difference of 1.24 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Uganda ahead.
China ranks 97th and Uganda ranks 98th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.53 current US$ | 305.26 current US$ | 213.73 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2000s | 93.15 current US$ | 205.59 current US$ | 112.44 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2010s | 218.55 current US$ | 316.57 current US$ | 98.02 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2020s | 207.96 current US$ | 206.72 current US$ | 1.24 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, China or Uganda?
- China, at 207.96 current US$ against 206.72 current US$ in Uganda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between China and Uganda?
- 1.24 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Uganda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Uganda rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- China ranks 97th and Uganda ranks 98th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.