China vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
China
207.96 current US$
in 2020
Mongolia
198.04 current US$
in 2020
China rank
97th
Mongolia rank
100th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- China
- Mongolia
How they compare
China currently reports 207.96 current US$ against 198.04 current US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 9.92 current US$.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mongolia ahead.
China ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 100th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.53 current US$ | 153.83 current US$ | 62.29 current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 93.15 current US$ | 135.13 current US$ | 41.98 current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 218.55 current US$ | 231.45 current US$ | 12.9 current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 207.96 current US$ | 198.04 current US$ | 9.93 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, China or Mongolia?
- China, at 207.96 current US$ against 198.04 current US$ in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between China and Mongolia?
- 9.92 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Mongolia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Mongolia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- China ranks 97th and Mongolia ranks 100th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.