China vs Gambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
China
207.96 current US$
in 2020
Gambia
211.52 current US$
in 2020
China rank
97th
Gambia rank
96th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- China
- Gambia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 211.52 current US$ against 207.96 current US$ in China, a difference of 3.56 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gambia ahead.
China ranks 97th and Gambia ranks 96th of 150 countries.
Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 91.53 current US$ | 383.3 current US$ | 291.76 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 93.15 current US$ | 318.86 current US$ | 225.71 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2010s | 218.55 current US$ | 359.43 current US$ | 140.88 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2020s | 207.96 current US$ | 211.52 current US$ | 3.55 current US$ | Gambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, China or Gambia?
- Gambia, at 211.52 current US$ against 207.96 current US$ in China as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between China and Gambia?
- 3.56 current US$, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Gambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Gambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- China ranks 97th and Gambia ranks 96th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.