Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Chile
2,623 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
3,763 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Suriname rank
10th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 3,763 current US$ against 2,623 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 1,140 current US$.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.4 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 728.62 current US$ | 302.41 current US$ | 426.21 current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 937.23 current US$ | 343.57 current US$ | 593.66 current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 2,408 current US$ | 2,244 current US$ | 163.49 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 2,623 current US$ | 3,763 current US$ | 1,141 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Chile or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 3,763 current US$ against 2,623 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Chile and Suriname?
- 1,140 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Chile ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.