Chile vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Chile
2,623 current US$
in 2020
Liberia
2,415 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
13th
Liberia rank
14th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Chile
  • Liberia
1.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2,623 current US$ against 2,415 current US$ in Liberia, a difference of 208 current US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Liberia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Liberia ahead.

Chile ranks 13th and Liberia ranks 14th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Liberia Difference Ahead
1990s 728.62 current US$ 1,051 current US$ 322.19 current US$ Liberia
2000s 937.23 current US$ 1,737 current US$ 799.38 current US$ Liberia
2010s 2,408 current US$ 2,835 current US$ 427.16 current US$ Liberia
2020s 2,623 current US$ 2,415 current US$ 207.68 current US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Chile or Liberia?
Chile, at 2,623 current US$ against 2,415 current US$ in Liberia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Chile and Liberia?
208 current US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Liberia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Liberia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Chile ranks 13th and Liberia ranks 14th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed