Chad vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Chad
348.84 current US$
in 2020
Malawi
363.22 current US$
in 2020
Chad rank
81st
Malawi rank
80th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Chad
  • Malawi
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 363.22 current US$ against 348.84 current US$ in Chad, a difference of 14.38 current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 81st and Malawi ranks 80th of 150 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 100.71 current US$ 470.71 current US$ 370 current US$ Malawi
2000s 86.09 current US$ 486.76 current US$ 400.67 current US$ Malawi
2010s 167.15 current US$ 521.34 current US$ 354.19 current US$ Malawi
2020s 348.84 current US$ 363.22 current US$ 14.38 current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Chad or Malawi?
Malawi, at 363.22 current US$ against 348.84 current US$ in Chad as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Chad and Malawi?
14.38 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chad and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Chad ranks 81st and Malawi ranks 80th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed