Brazil vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Brazil
1,557 current US$
in 2020
Eswatini
1,499 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
21st
Eswatini rank
23rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Brazil
  • Eswatini
5001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 1,557 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 58 current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.

Brazil ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 568.82 current US$ 1,053 current US$ 483.96 current US$ Eswatini
2000s 594.11 current US$ 884.53 current US$ 290.41 current US$ Eswatini
2010s 1,529 current US$ 1,230 current US$ 298.57 current US$ Brazil
2020s 1,557 current US$ 1,499 current US$ 58.04 current US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Brazil or Eswatini?
Brazil, at 1,557 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Brazil and Eswatini?
58 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Brazil ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed