Brazil vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$) (timber)
Brazil
1,557 current US$
in 2020
Eswatini
1,499 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
21st
Eswatini rank
23rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$) (timber) over time
- Brazil
- Eswatini
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 1,557 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 58 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.
Brazil ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 568.82 current US$ | 1,053 current US$ | 483.96 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 594.11 current US$ | 884.53 current US$ | 290.41 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 1,529 current US$ | 1,230 current US$ | 298.57 current US$ | Brazil |
| 2020s | 1,557 current US$ | 1,499 current US$ | 58.04 current US$ | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Brazil or Eswatini?
- Brazil, at 1,557 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Brazil and Eswatini?
- 58 current US$, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Brazil ranks 21st and Eswatini ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.