Botswana vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Botswana
453.13 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
476.77 current US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
70th
Sudan rank
67th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Botswana
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 476.77 current US$ against 453.13 current US$ in Botswana, a difference of 23.64 current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 67th of 150 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 600.5 current US$ | 670.2 current US$ | 69.7 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 453.13 current US$ | 476.77 current US$ | 23.65 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Botswana or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 476.77 current US$ against 453.13 current US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Botswana and Sudan?
- 23.64 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Botswana ranks 70th and Sudan ranks 67th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.