Botswana vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Botswana
453.13 current US$
in 2020
Mali
445.62 current US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
70th
Mali rank
71st
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Botswana
- Mali
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 453.13 current US$ against 445.62 current US$ in Mali, a difference of 7.51 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 70th and Mali ranks 71st of 150 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 354.24 current US$ | 338.2 current US$ | 16.04 current US$ | Botswana |
| 2000s | 379.5 current US$ | 347.5 current US$ | 32 current US$ | Botswana |
| 2010s | 585.68 current US$ | 565.35 current US$ | 20.33 current US$ | Botswana |
| 2020s | 453.13 current US$ | 445.62 current US$ | 7.5 current US$ | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Botswana or Mali?
- Botswana, at 453.13 current US$ against 445.62 current US$ in Mali as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Botswana and Mali?
- 7.51 current US$, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mali?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Botswana and Mali rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Botswana ranks 70th and Mali ranks 71st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.