Belgium vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Belgium
187.89 current US$
in 2020
Peru
197.6 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
102nd
Peru rank
101st
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Belgium
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 197.6 current US$ against 187.89 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 9.71 current US$.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.
Belgium ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 101st of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 143.47 current US$ | 128.79 current US$ | 14.68 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 161.7 current US$ | 123.96 current US$ | 37.73 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 207.8 current US$ | 275.01 current US$ | 67.2 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 187.89 current US$ | 197.6 current US$ | 9.71 current US$ | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belgium or Peru?
- Peru, at 197.6 current US$ against 187.89 current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belgium and Peru?
- 9.71 current US$, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Belgium ranks 102nd and Peru ranks 101st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.