Belarus vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Belarus
1,823 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,761 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
19th
Zambia rank
20th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Belarus
- Zambia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1,823 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 62 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.
Belarus ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 527.05 current US$ | 654.72 current US$ | 127.66 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2000s | 359.23 current US$ | 1,378 current US$ | 1,019 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,167 current US$ | 2,308 current US$ | 1,141 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,823 current US$ | 1,761 current US$ | 62.43 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belarus or Zambia?
- Belarus, at 1,823 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belarus and Zambia?
- 62 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.