Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Belarus
1,823 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
1,832 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
19th
Guinea-Bissau rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Belarus
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,832 current US$ against 1,823 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 9 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 19th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 150 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 527.05 current US$ | 1,274 current US$ | 746.98 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 359.23 current US$ | 1,493 current US$ | 1,134 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 1,167 current US$ | 2,414 current US$ | 1,247 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1,823 current US$ | 1,832 current US$ | 8.79 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belarus or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1,832 current US$ against 1,823 current US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 9 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.