Belarus vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Belarus
1,823 current US$
in 2020
Congo
1,913 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
19th
Congo rank
17th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Belarus
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,913 current US$ against 1,823 current US$ in Belarus, a difference of 90 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 19th and Congo ranks 17th of 150 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 527.05 current US$ | 1,161 current US$ | 634.26 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 359.23 current US$ | 1,487 current US$ | 1,127 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,167 current US$ | 2,056 current US$ | 888.38 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 1,823 current US$ | 1,913 current US$ | 89.98 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belarus or Congo?
- Congo, at 1,913 current US$ against 1,823 current US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belarus and Congo?
- 90 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Belarus ranks 19th and Congo ranks 17th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.