Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Australia
2,174 current US$
in 2020
Paraguay
2,156 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
15th
Paraguay rank
16th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Australia
- Paraguay
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2,174 current US$ against 2,156 current US$ in Paraguay, a difference of 18 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Paraguay ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Paraguay ranks 16th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,037 current US$ | 1,012 current US$ | 25.67 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 1,280 current US$ | 938.25 current US$ | 341.88 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 1,849 current US$ | 2,234 current US$ | 384.81 current US$ | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 2,174 current US$ | 2,156 current US$ | 17.87 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Paraguay?
- Australia, at 2,174 current US$ against 2,156 current US$ in Paraguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Paraguay?
- 18 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Paraguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Paraguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Australia ranks 15th and Paraguay ranks 16th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.