Australia vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Australia
2,174 current US$
in 2020
Costa Rica
2,725 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
15th
Costa Rica rank
12th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Australia
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 2,725 current US$ against 2,174 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 551 current US$.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Costa Rica ranks 12th of 151 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,037 current US$ | 1,706 current US$ | 669.14 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 1,280 current US$ | 1,365 current US$ | 84.9 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 1,849 current US$ | 3,051 current US$ | 1,202 current US$ | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 2,174 current US$ | 2,725 current US$ | 550.56 current US$ | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 2,725 current US$ against 2,174 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Costa Rica?
- 551 current US$, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Costa Rica?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Australia ranks 15th and Costa Rica ranks 12th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.