Australia vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Australia
2,174 current US$
in 2020
Congo
1,913 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
15th
Congo rank
17th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Australia currently reports 2,174 current US$ against 1,913 current US$ in Congo, a difference of 261 current US$.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Congo ranks 17th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,037 current US$ | 1,161 current US$ | 123.98 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,280 current US$ | 1,487 current US$ | 206.48 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,849 current US$ | 2,056 current US$ | 206.67 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 2,174 current US$ | 1,913 current US$ | 261.19 current US$ | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Congo?
- Australia, at 2,174 current US$ against 1,913 current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Congo?
- 261 current US$, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Australia ranks 15th and Congo ranks 17th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.