Australia vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Australia
2,174 current US$
in 2020
Chile
2,623 current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
15th
Chile rank
13th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2,623 current US$ against 2,174 current US$ in Australia, a difference of 449 current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 13th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,037 current US$ | 728.62 current US$ | 308.72 current US$ | Australia |
| 2000s | 1,280 current US$ | 937.23 current US$ | 342.9 current US$ | Australia |
| 2010s | 1,849 current US$ | 2,408 current US$ | 558.78 current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 2,174 current US$ | 2,623 current US$ | 448.43 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Chile?
- Chile, at 2,623 current US$ against 2,174 current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Chile?
- 449 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Australia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 13th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.