Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Sao Tome and Principe
97.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
106.39 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th
Uruguay rank
64th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uruguay
5075100125150175199520072020

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 106.39 real chained 2019 US$ against 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 9.23 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 173.99 real chained 2019 US$ 66.28 real chained 2019 US$ 107.71 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 149.69 real chained 2019 US$ 82.94 real chained 2019 US$ 66.75 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 114.32 real chained 2019 US$ 99.79 real chained 2019 US$ 14.53 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ 106.39 real chained 2019 US$ 9.23 real chained 2019 US$ Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Sao Tome and Principe or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 106.39 real chained 2019 US$ against 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
9.23 real chained 2019 US$, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th and Uruguay ranks 64th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/sao-tome-and-principe/uruguay/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed