Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Papua New Guinea
606.51 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
578.02 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
13th
Zambia rank
14th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 606.51 real chained 2019 US$ against 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 28.49 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zambia ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 13th and Zambia ranks 14th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,209 real chained 2019 US$ 1,261 real chained 2019 US$ 51.64 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2000s 940.16 real chained 2019 US$ 1,007 real chained 2019 US$ 66.97 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2010s 697.39 real chained 2019 US$ 704.89 real chained 2019 US$ 7.51 real chained 2019 US$ Zambia
2020s 606.51 real chained 2019 US$ 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ 28.49 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
Papua New Guinea, at 606.51 real chained 2019 US$ against 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
28.49 real chained 2019 US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Papua New Guinea ranks 13th and Zambia ranks 14th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/papua-new-guinea/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/papua-new-guinea/zambia/">Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed