North Macedonia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

North Macedonia
54.2 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa
52.46 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
North Macedonia rank
94th
South Africa rank
96th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • North Macedonia
  • South Africa
020406080199520072020

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 54.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 52.46 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa, a difference of 1.74 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 94th and South Africa ranks 96th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 47.41 real chained 2019 US$ 71.58 real chained 2019 US$ 24.17 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 48.09 real chained 2019 US$ 65.28 real chained 2019 US$ 17.2 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 51.83 real chained 2019 US$ 56.8 real chained 2019 US$ 4.97 real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 54.2 real chained 2019 US$ 52.46 real chained 2019 US$ 1.74 real chained 2019 US$ North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, North Macedonia or South Africa?
North Macedonia, at 54.2 real chained 2019 US$ against 52.46 real chained 2019 US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between North Macedonia and South Africa?
1.74 real chained 2019 US$, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do North Macedonia and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
North Macedonia ranks 94th and South Africa ranks 96th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/north-macedonia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/north-macedonia/south-africa/">North Macedonia vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed