Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Nicaragua
106.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
97.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Nicaragua rank
63rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 106.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 9.76 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.

Nicaragua ranks 63rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 151 countries.

Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 247.31 real chained 2019 US$ 173.99 real chained 2019 US$ 73.31 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2000s 190.16 real chained 2019 US$ 149.69 real chained 2019 US$ 40.48 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2010s 132.39 real chained 2019 US$ 114.32 real chained 2019 US$ 18.07 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua
2020s 106.92 real chained 2019 US$ 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ 9.76 real chained 2019 US$ Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Nicaragua or Sao Tome and Principe?
Nicaragua, at 106.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
9.76 real chained 2019 US$, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Nicaragua and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Nicaragua ranks 63rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/nicaragua/sao-tome-and-principe/">Nicaragua vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed