New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

New Zealand
485.71 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
542.69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 542.69 real chained 2019 US$ against 485.71 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 56.98 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 644.04 real chained 2019 US$ 794.52 real chained 2019 US$ 150.48 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 602.58 real chained 2019 US$ 724.82 real chained 2019 US$ 122.24 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 534.95 real chained 2019 US$ 617.27 real chained 2019 US$ 82.32 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 485.71 real chained 2019 US$ 542.69 real chained 2019 US$ 56.98 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 542.69 real chained 2019 US$ against 485.71 real chained 2019 US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
56.98 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
New Zealand ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/new-zealand/zimbabwe/">New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed