Mexico vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Mexico
123.79 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
118.51 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
57th
Sudan rank
58th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Mexico
- Sudan
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 123.79 real chained 2019 US$ against 118.51 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 5.28 real chained 2019 US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Mexico ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 58th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 130.47 real chained 2019 US$ | 141.76 real chained 2019 US$ | 11.29 real chained 2019 US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 123.79 real chained 2019 US$ | 118.51 real chained 2019 US$ | 5.28 real chained 2019 US$ | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Mexico or Sudan?
- Mexico, at 123.79 real chained 2019 US$ against 118.51 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Mexico and Sudan?
- 5.28 real chained 2019 US$, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Mexico and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Mexico ranks 57th and Sudan ranks 58th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.