Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Korea
78.85 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
79.43 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Korea rank
76th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
75th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Korea
  • Trinidad and Tobago
020406080100199520072020

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 79.43 real chained 2019 US$ against 78.85 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea, a difference of 0.58 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Korea ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 75th of 151 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 92.07 real chained 2019 US$ 95.55 real chained 2019 US$ 3.48 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 86.89 real chained 2019 US$ 90.87 real chained 2019 US$ 3.97 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 81.21 real chained 2019 US$ 83.57 real chained 2019 US$ 2.36 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 78.85 real chained 2019 US$ 79.43 real chained 2019 US$ 0.5751 real chained 2019 US$ Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Korea or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 79.43 real chained 2019 US$ against 78.85 real chained 2019 US$ in Korea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.58 real chained 2019 US$, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Korea and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Korea ranks 76th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 75th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/korea-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/korea-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/">Korea vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed