Georgia vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Georgia
69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland
74.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
83rd
Iceland rank
81st

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Georgia
  • Iceland
020406080199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 69 real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia, a difference of 5.16 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 83rd and Iceland ranks 81st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 57.4 real chained 2019 US$ 50.59 real chained 2019 US$ 6.81 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2000s 64.68 real chained 2019 US$ 64.57 real chained 2019 US$ 0.1105 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2010s 68.8 real chained 2019 US$ 75.82 real chained 2019 US$ 7.02 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland
2020s 69 real chained 2019 US$ 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ 5.16 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Georgia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 69 real chained 2019 US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Georgia and Iceland?
5.16 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Georgia ranks 83rd and Iceland ranks 81st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/georgia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/georgia/iceland/">Georgia vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed