Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Croatia
84.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
97.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
68th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Croatia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia, a difference of 12.24 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 68th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 151 countries.

Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 73.02 real chained 2019 US$ 173.99 real chained 2019 US$ 100.98 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 77.96 real chained 2019 US$ 149.69 real chained 2019 US$ 71.72 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 81.31 real chained 2019 US$ 114.32 real chained 2019 US$ 33.02 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ 12.24 real chained 2019 US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Croatia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 97.16 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe?
12.24 real chained 2019 US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Croatia ranks 68th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/croatia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/croatia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Croatia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed