Croatia vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Croatia
84.92 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini
84.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
68th
Eswatini rank
71st

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Croatia
  • Eswatini
020406080100199520072020

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 0.8 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.

Croatia ranks 68th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 73.02 real chained 2019 US$ 94.9 real chained 2019 US$ 21.89 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini
2000s 77.96 real chained 2019 US$ 89.62 real chained 2019 US$ 11.66 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini
2010s 81.31 real chained 2019 US$ 86.59 real chained 2019 US$ 5.29 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini
2020s 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ 0.8013 real chained 2019 US$ Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Croatia or Eswatini?
Croatia, at 84.92 real chained 2019 US$ against 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Croatia and Eswatini?
0.8 real chained 2019 US$, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Croatia ranks 68th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/croatia/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/croatia/eswatini/">Croatia vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed