Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Congo
700.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
578.02 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
11th
Zambia rank
14th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Congo currently reports 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 122.43 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Zambia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 14th of 151 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 1,408 real chained 2019 US$ 1,261 real chained 2019 US$ 146.57 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 1,115 real chained 2019 US$ 1,007 real chained 2019 US$ 108.24 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 804.33 real chained 2019 US$ 704.89 real chained 2019 US$ 99.44 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ 122.44 real chained 2019 US$ Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Congo or Zambia?
Congo, at 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ against 578.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Congo and Zambia?
122.43 real chained 2019 US$, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Congo ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 14th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed