Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Congo
700.45 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sweden
921.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
11th
Sweden rank
9th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Congo
  • Sweden
05001.0k1.5k199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 921.12 real chained 2019 US$ against 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 220.67 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1,408 real chained 2019 US$ 1,084 real chained 2019 US$ 323.45 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 1,115 real chained 2019 US$ 1,060 real chained 2019 US$ 55.04 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 804.33 real chained 2019 US$ 976.25 real chained 2019 US$ 171.92 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden
2020s 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ 921.12 real chained 2019 US$ 220.66 real chained 2019 US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Congo or Sweden?
Sweden, at 921.12 real chained 2019 US$ against 700.45 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Congo and Sweden?
220.67 real chained 2019 US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Congo ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/congo-rep/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/congo-rep/sweden/">Congo vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed