China vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

China
65.64 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Georgia
69 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China rank
86th
Georgia rank
83rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • China
  • Georgia
0204060199520072020

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 69 real chained 2019 US$ against 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ in China, a difference of 3.36 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

China ranks 86th and Georgia ranks 83rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Georgia Difference Ahead
1990s 58.58 real chained 2019 US$ 57.4 real chained 2019 US$ 1.18 real chained 2019 US$ China
2000s 60.81 real chained 2019 US$ 64.68 real chained 2019 US$ 3.87 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2010s 64.13 real chained 2019 US$ 68.8 real chained 2019 US$ 4.67 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia
2020s 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ 69 real chained 2019 US$ 3.35 real chained 2019 US$ Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, China or Georgia?
Georgia, at 69 real chained 2019 US$ against 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ in China as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between China and Georgia?
3.36 real chained 2019 US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Georgia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Georgia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
China ranks 86th and Georgia ranks 83rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/china/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/china/georgia/">China vs Georgia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed