Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Burkina Faso
80.08 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini
84.12 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
74th
Eswatini rank
71st

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Eswatini
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso, a difference of 4.04 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 187.35 real chained 2019 US$ 94.9 real chained 2019 US$ 92.45 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2000s 142.82 real chained 2019 US$ 89.62 real chained 2019 US$ 53.2 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2010s 98.26 real chained 2019 US$ 86.59 real chained 2019 US$ 11.66 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2020s 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ 4.04 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Burkina Faso or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 84.12 real chained 2019 US$ against 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Burkina Faso as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
4.04 real chained 2019 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Burkina Faso and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Burkina Faso ranks 74th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/burkina-faso/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/burkina-faso/eswatini/">Burkina Faso vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed