Botswana vs Finland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Botswana
1,159 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland
1,680 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Botswana rank
4th
Finland rank
3rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Botswana
  • Finland
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1,680 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,159 real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana, a difference of 521 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 4th and Finland ranks 3rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 2,152 real chained 2019 US$ 1,797 real chained 2019 US$ 355.55 real chained 2019 US$ Botswana
2000s 1,765 real chained 2019 US$ 1,766 real chained 2019 US$ 1.67 real chained 2019 US$ Finland
2010s 1,351 real chained 2019 US$ 1,698 real chained 2019 US$ 346.99 real chained 2019 US$ Finland
2020s 1,159 real chained 2019 US$ 1,680 real chained 2019 US$ 520.25 real chained 2019 US$ Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Botswana or Finland?
Finland, at 1,680 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,159 real chained 2019 US$ in Botswana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Botswana and Finland?
521 real chained 2019 US$, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Finland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Botswana and Finland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Botswana ranks 4th and Finland ranks 3rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Finland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/botswana/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/botswana/finland/">Botswana vs Finland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed