Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Bosnia and Herzegovina
78.32 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso
80.08 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
77th
Burkina Faso rank
74th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Burkina Faso
50100150200199520072020

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ against 78.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.76 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Burkina Faso ranks 74th of 151 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Burkina Faso Difference Ahead
1990s 63.77 real chained 2019 US$ 187.35 real chained 2019 US$ 123.58 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2000s 61.28 real chained 2019 US$ 142.82 real chained 2019 US$ 81.54 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2010s 71.94 real chained 2019 US$ 98.26 real chained 2019 US$ 26.32 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso
2020s 78.32 real chained 2019 US$ 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ 1.76 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Burkina Faso?
Burkina Faso, at 80.08 real chained 2019 US$ against 78.32 real chained 2019 US$ in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
1.76 real chained 2019 US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Burkina Faso rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 77th and Burkina Faso ranks 74th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/bosnia-and-herzegovina/burkina-faso/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/bosnia-and-herzegovina/burkina-faso/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Burkina Faso: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed