Belgium vs China: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Belgium
64.73 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
China
65.64 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
88th
China rank
86th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Belgium
  • China
020406080199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.73 real chained 2019 US$ in Belgium, a difference of 0.91 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 88th and China ranks 86th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and China in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium China Difference Ahead
1990s 80.54 real chained 2019 US$ 58.58 real chained 2019 US$ 21.96 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2000s 70.03 real chained 2019 US$ 60.81 real chained 2019 US$ 9.22 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2010s 66.53 real chained 2019 US$ 64.13 real chained 2019 US$ 2.41 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2020s 64.73 real chained 2019 US$ 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ 0.9149 real chained 2019 US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belgium or China?
China, at 65.64 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.73 real chained 2019 US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belgium and China?
0.91 real chained 2019 US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and China rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Belgium ranks 88th and China ranks 86th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs China: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/belgium/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/belgium/china/">Belgium vs China: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed