Belarus vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Belarus
77.33 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland
74.16 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
79th
Iceland rank
81st

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Belarus
  • Iceland
020406080199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 77.33 real chained 2019 US$ against 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Iceland, a difference of 3.17 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 79th and Iceland ranks 81st of 151 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 66.47 real chained 2019 US$ 50.59 real chained 2019 US$ 15.88 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2000s 71.85 real chained 2019 US$ 64.57 real chained 2019 US$ 7.28 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2010s 75.9 real chained 2019 US$ 75.82 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0776 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2020s 77.33 real chained 2019 US$ 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ 3.18 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Belarus or Iceland?
Belarus, at 77.33 real chained 2019 US$ against 74.16 real chained 2019 US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Belarus and Iceland?
3.17 real chained 2019 US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Belarus ranks 79th and Iceland ranks 81st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/belarus/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/belarus/iceland/">Belarus vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed