Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Austria
266.09 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
299.87 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Austria rank
27th
Guinea-Bissau rank
25th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Austria
  • Guinea-Bissau
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 299.87 real chained 2019 US$ against 266.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Austria, a difference of 33.78 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 151 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 291.65 real chained 2019 US$ 571.66 real chained 2019 US$ 280 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 286.11 real chained 2019 US$ 473.13 real chained 2019 US$ 187.03 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 274.26 real chained 2019 US$ 352.35 real chained 2019 US$ 78.09 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 266.09 real chained 2019 US$ 299.87 real chained 2019 US$ 33.78 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Austria or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 299.87 real chained 2019 US$ against 266.09 real chained 2019 US$ in Austria as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Austria and Guinea-Bissau?
33.78 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Austria and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Austria ranks 27th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/austria/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/austria/guinea-bissau/">Austria vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed