Australia vs Belize: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Australia
962.15 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belize
1,018 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
7th
Belize rank
5th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Australia
  • Belize
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Belize currently reports 1,018 real chained 2019 US$ against 962.15 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia, a difference of 55.85 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Belize's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Belize has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 7th and Belize ranks 5th of 151 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belize Difference Ahead
1990s 1,325 real chained 2019 US$ 2,179 real chained 2019 US$ 854.15 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2000s 1,196 real chained 2019 US$ 1,640 real chained 2019 US$ 444.47 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2010s 1,032 real chained 2019 US$ 1,191 real chained 2019 US$ 159.14 real chained 2019 US$ Belize
2020s 962.15 real chained 2019 US$ 1,018 real chained 2019 US$ 56.14 real chained 2019 US$ Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Australia or Belize?
Belize, at 1,018 real chained 2019 US$ against 962.15 real chained 2019 US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Australia and Belize?
55.85 real chained 2019 US$, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belize?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Belize rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Australia ranks 7th and Belize ranks 5th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belize: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/australia/belize/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-real/australia/belize/">Australia vs Belize: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed