Sri Lanka vs Togo: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Sri Lanka
50.71 current US$
in 2020
Togo
51.27 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
97th
Togo rank
96th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Sri Lanka
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 51.27 current US$ against 50.71 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.56 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 97th and Togo ranks 96th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Togo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.7 current US$ | 35.66 current US$ | 13.04 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 48.81 current US$ | 21.21 current US$ | 27.6 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 51.54 current US$ | 43.54 current US$ | 8.01 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 50.71 current US$ | 51.27 current US$ | 0.5593 current US$ | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Sri Lanka or Togo?
- Togo, at 51.27 current US$ against 50.71 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 0.56 current US$, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Togo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Togo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Sri Lanka ranks 97th and Togo ranks 96th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.