Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Papua New Guinea
602.12 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
552.44 current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea rank
13th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 602.12 current US$ against 552.44 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 49.68 current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 149 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 830.91 current US$ 471.96 current US$ 358.95 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 664.21 current US$ 502.3 current US$ 161.91 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 646.01 current US$ 542.95 current US$ 103.07 current US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 602.12 current US$ 552.44 current US$ 49.68 current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 602.12 current US$ against 552.44 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
49.68 current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Papua New Guinea ranks 13th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed