New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

New Zealand
490.68 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
552.44 current US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
18th
Zimbabwe rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • New Zealand
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 552.44 current US$ against 490.68 current US$ in New Zealand, a difference of 61.76 current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 480.99 current US$ 471.96 current US$ 9.03 current US$ New Zealand
2000s 422.8 current US$ 502.3 current US$ 79.49 current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 491.94 current US$ 542.95 current US$ 51.01 current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 490.68 current US$ 552.44 current US$ 61.76 current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, New Zealand or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 552.44 current US$ against 490.68 current US$ in New Zealand as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
61.76 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
New Zealand ranks 18th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/new-zealand/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/new-zealand/zimbabwe/">New Zealand vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed