Iraq vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Iraq
3.95 current US$
in 2020
Singapore
4.06 current US$
in 2020
Iraq rank
141st
Singapore rank
140th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Iraq
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 4.06 current US$ against 3.95 current US$ in Iraq, a difference of 0.11 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Iraq ahead.
Iraq ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 140th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Iraq averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.16 current US$ | 2.41 current US$ | 4.75 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2000s | 5.24 current US$ | 0.96 current US$ | 4.28 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2010s | 4.29 current US$ | 3.02 current US$ | 1.27 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2020s | 3.95 current US$ | 4.06 current US$ | 0.1046 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Iraq or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 4.06 current US$ against 3.95 current US$ in Iraq as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Iraq and Singapore?
- 0.11 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iraq and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Iraq ranks 141st and Singapore ranks 140th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.