Guinea vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Guinea
130.56 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro
135.53 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
54th
Montenegro rank
53rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Guinea
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 135.53 current US$ against 130.56 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 4.97 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 54th and Montenegro ranks 53rd of 149 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 163.78 current US$ | 99.37 current US$ | 64.41 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 152.21 current US$ | 125.6 current US$ | 26.61 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 130.56 current US$ | 135.53 current US$ | 4.96 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Guinea or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 135.53 current US$ against 130.56 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Guinea and Montenegro?
- 4.97 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Guinea ranks 54th and Montenegro ranks 53rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.