Guinea vs Mexico: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Guinea
130.56 current US$
in 2020
Mexico
126.57 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
54th
Mexico rank
57th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Guinea
- Mexico
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 130.56 current US$ against 126.57 current US$ in Mexico, a difference of 3.99 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 57th of 149 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 146.73 current US$ | 105.87 current US$ | 40.87 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 156.86 current US$ | 114.58 current US$ | 42.28 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 152.21 current US$ | 121.62 current US$ | 30.59 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 130.56 current US$ | 126.57 current US$ | 4 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Guinea or Mexico?
- Guinea, at 130.56 current US$ against 126.57 current US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Guinea and Mexico?
- 3.99 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Mexico?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Mexico rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Guinea ranks 54th and Mexico ranks 57th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.