Guinea-Bissau vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection

Guinea-Bissau
305.74 current US$
in 2020
Russian Federation
349.74 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
25th
Russian Federation rank
22nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Russian Federation
0100200300400500199520072020

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 349.74 current US$ against 305.74 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 44 current US$.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 22nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 3 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 453.59 current US$ 250.07 current US$ 203.52 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 425.65 current US$ 282.07 current US$ 143.58 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 332.65 current US$ 327.75 current US$ 4.9 current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 305.74 current US$ 349.74 current US$ 44 current US$ Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Guinea-Bissau or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 349.74 current US$ against 305.74 current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
44 current US$, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Russian Federation rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Russian Federation ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/guinea-bissau/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-nonwood-forest-protection-ecosystem-services-current/guinea-bissau/russian-federation/">Guinea-Bissau vs Russian Federation: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed