Georgia vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Georgia
69.11 current US$
in 2020
Iceland
75.03 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
82nd
Iceland rank
81st
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Georgia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 75.03 current US$ against 69.11 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 5.92 current US$.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 82nd and Iceland ranks 81st of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 42.44 current US$ | 34.24 current US$ | 8.2 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2000s | 53.22 current US$ | 43.25 current US$ | 9.97 current US$ | Georgia |
| 2010s | 63.85 current US$ | 70.43 current US$ | 6.59 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2020s | 69.11 current US$ | 75.03 current US$ | 5.93 current US$ | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Georgia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 75.03 current US$ against 69.11 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Georgia and Iceland?
- 5.92 current US$, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Georgia ranks 82nd and Iceland ranks 81st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.