Ethiopia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection
Ethiopia
38.1 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
38.83 current US$
in 2020
Ethiopia rank
106th
Serbia rank
105th
Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection over time
- Ethiopia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 38.83 current US$ against 38.1 current US$ in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.73 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 149 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.99 current US$ | 28.34 current US$ | 9.65 current US$ | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 41.79 current US$ | 33.8 current US$ | 7.99 current US$ | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 38.1 current US$ | 38.83 current US$ | 0.7281 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection, Ethiopia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 38.83 current US$ against 38.1 current US$ in Ethiopia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection between Ethiopia and Serbia?
- 0.73 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Ethiopia and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection?
- Ethiopia ranks 106th and Serbia ranks 105th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, nonwood forest protection ecosystem services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.